One way to deter such misconduct is to say that you cannot avoid that accountability by filing for reorganization in bankruptcy any more than you can evade a judgment for damages resulting from drunk driving. Sound public policy also dictates that the debt incurred by a company's action should not be ducked by a company reorganizing under chapter 11 while the company goes on its merry way and the victims are victimized twice. This amendment does not judge the merits of any lawsuit or the liability of any parties involved in these lawsuits. The amendment simply gives our citizens the assurance that if they win a civil damage award against a firearm manufacturer or distributor, the damages caused by the perpetrator cannot be evaded by being dismissed in bankruptcy court.
Mike Levin: “One way to deter such misconduct is to say that you cannot avoid that accountability by filing for reorganization in…”
On the recordFebruary 1, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1999 related to accountability for firearm manufacturers.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Sep 3, 2026
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
Sep 3, 2026
We urge you to immediately reinstate the funding for these projects that were subject to blatantly partisan cancellation.
Oct 8, 2026
USDA must take these findings seriously and act quickly to address the gaps identified by GAO.
Oct 3, 2026
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.





