I believe the Senator indicated before that TRICARE was available to all retirees under both proposals, that this would be one difference in that regard, and that under your proposal, Part B would not have to be paid for by the retiree; whereas, under the proposal of the Senator from Virginia, it would have to be. I am not arguing the merits or demerits, but factually that is a difference; is that correct?
Discussing differences in TRICARE availability and costs for retirees under two proposals.
Share
More from Mike Levin
I firmly believe in a future where Israelis and Palestinians live side by side in peace, security, and self-determination.
Esmeralda and David represent the very best of what community means. They do not wait to be asked; they simply show up, roll up their sleeves, and give everything they have to the people around them.
Today’s announcement of potential sites for Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses has been years in the making.
She has shown that one parent's love, paired with tireless resolve, can move the frontiers of medicine forward.
Other voices in this conversation
