The IPS, Interim Payment System, has been grossly unfair, grossly unfair to low-cost, cost-effective providers in States, especially States like Michigan. This is a step in the right direction. But I want to express two hopes. Number one, this is not retroactive. A lot of very good, healthy, once healthy, home health agencies have been terribly hurt. I think our system should protect the cost effective and not assist those that are cost ineffective. So I hope if this bill gets to conference that we can look at that issue. Also, the chairman of the subcommittee and I have talked about the entire bill. I hope we can take another look in the way we pay for this. I do not think we should mortgage the future to correct the past or the present. So I rise in support of this bill. It is urgently needed.
Mike Levin: “The IPS, Interim Payment System, has been grossly unfair, grossly unfair to low-cost, cost-effective providers in…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the fairness of the Interim Payment System for home health agencies.
Share
More from Mike Levin
When Michaelle’s son Tristan was diagnosed with an ultra-rare genetic condition, she and her husband, Kevin, refused to accept that there was nothing to be done.
Head Start is not just preschool. For hundreds of thousands of children from low-income families, it is where they learn to read, receive basic health screenings, get support for disabilities, and begin kindergarten with a real chance to…
They do not wait to be asked; they simply show up, roll up their sleeves, and give everything they have to the people around them.
None of this is easy. It demands a more principled, inclusive, and constructive kind of American leadership than the one we have now.





