The reason for my concern about this amendment is reflected in the statement that was sent to us by the administration. I very much support the purpose of this amendment. I think it is right on target, and I commend the Senator from Arkansas for focusing on this problem. But the statement of the administration policy raises a concern that the requirement to disclose publicly the list of Chinese military companies operating directly or indirectly in the United States could implicate classified information that needs to be protected in the interests of national security, i.e., intelligence sources and methods. That is the basis for my concern, and therefore I will vote ``no'' on a voice vote, and I ask unanimous consent that this statement of administration policy be printed in the Record.
Mike Levin: “The reason for my concern about this amendment is reflected in the statement that was sent to us by the administration.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over an amendment related to Chinese military companies and national security.
Share
More from Mike Levin
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
There is no other acceptable remedy for this corrupt abuse of power and weaponization of taxpayer dollars.
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.
For more than a decade, Nick and Cheryl have used the power of film to bring the wonders of the ocean, and the dangers facing it, into homes around the world.





