while I oppose the level and distribution of funding in this amendment, it is no worse than what is in the current budget resolution, and it proposes a tax cut plan which is superior to the one before us. While it is a better alternative if it is substituted for the resolution before us, I would vote against it on final passage because it still underfunds too many of our nation's priorities.
Mike Levin: “while I oppose the level and distribution of funding in this amendment, it is no worse than what is in the current…”
On the recordMarch 25, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to budget resolution and tax cuts.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 29, 2026
Today’s announcement of potential sites for Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses has been years in the making.
Jul 24, 2026
These new tariffs are more of the same: a nationwide sales tax that will make life even harder for families already struggling under the costs of Trump’s reckless war in Iran.
Jul 21, 2026
The high cost of IVF treatment makes it difficult for thousands of Americans to start or grow their families. Family planning and fertility treatments are too costly and out of reach for too many Americans.
Jul 1, 2026
This is one of the single largest loans in the history of OSC, and a commitment of that scale warrants careful review on its own.





