While I oppose the level and distribution of funding in this amendment, it is no worse than what is in the current budget resolution, and it proposes a tax cut plan which is superior to the one before us. While it is a better alternative if it is substituted for the resolution before us, I would vote against it on final passage because it still underfunds too many of our nation's priorities.
Discussing an amendment related to budget resolution and tax cuts.
Share
More from Mike Levin
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
More than one million veterans face food insecurity in this country. That is one million too many.
Other voices in this conversation
