If it turns out otherwise when the midterm review is completed, despite that best estimate on the part of the Secretary of Defense, will the amendment still authorize the expenditure of that $814 million in the ways specified? In other words, if it turns out to be inaccurate and there is only $600 million in savings, am I not correct that the amendment would nonetheless authorize the $814 million?
Questioning the implications of a defense funding amendment during a legislative discussion.
Share
More from Mike Levin
There is no other acceptable remedy for this corrupt abuse of power and weaponization of taxpayer dollars.
Her passion for helping others also led her to establish Working Women Winning, a program that equips women with the skills, connections, and opportunities necessary to build rewarding careers and achieve financial stability.
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
Other voices in this conversation
