I have been reluctant to put the Federal Government in the position of judging the appropriateness of a binding arbitration clause in a private contract. However, I will support the amendment because I believe that in the case, the relative ability of parties to negotiate contract provisions are particularly uneven. My vote should not be interpreted as an indication of my position on future legislation that may be offered on the subject of the Federal Government overriding binding arbitration clauses. I would like to ask the sponsor of the amendment, my colleague from Wisconsin, whether, under this amendment, either party to a contract that contains a binding arbitration clause can choose alternatively to go to court to resolve the dispute.
Mike Levin: “I have been reluctant to put the Federal Government in the position of judging the appropriateness of a binding…”
On the recordDecember 13, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed amendment on binding arbitration clauses in contracts.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 28, 2026
“Esmeralda and David represent the very best of what community means. They do not wait to be asked; they simply show up, roll up their sleeves, and give everything they have to the people around them.
Jul 7, 2026
David's commitment to the greater good and Esmeralda's steadfast leadership remind us that strong communities are built one dedicated person at a time.
Aug 7, 2026
Head Start is not just preschool. For hundreds of thousands of children from low-income families, it is where they learn to read, receive basic health screenings, get support for disabilities, and begin kindergarten with a real chance to…





