I don't think working closely with the Commission collaboratively in any way means they are not going to report to us. They will continue to report to the Congress. There is no shift of the reporting function. As a matter of fact, the IG for Iraq does not have the authority which should have been given to him, and would now be given to him by this bill, for instance, on logistics support contracts. Why in heaven's name should the special IG not have logistics support contracts jurisdiction?
Mike Levin: “I don't think working closely with the Commission collaboratively in any way means they are not going to report to us.…”
On the recordSeptember 26, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the authority of the Inspector General for Iraq during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 23, 2026
This deeply unpopular and unrelated bill should not be attached to the NDAA.
Jul 29, 2026
Congress must now work in a bipartisan, bicameral fashion to authorize the Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses and write them into law with clear oversight, clear benchmarks, and clear connections to permanent disposal.
Aug 7, 2026
Head Start is not just preschool. For hundreds of thousands of children from low-income families, it is where they learn to read, receive basic health screenings, get support for disabilities, and begin kindergarten with a real chance to…





