This is what Mark Zandi said about the President's job proposal: [It] would help stabilize confidence and keep the U.S. from sliding back into recession. [It] would add 2 percentage points to GDP growth next year, add 1.9 million jobs, and cut the unemployment rate by a percentage point. The plan would cost about $450 billion, about $250 billion in tax cuts and $200 billion in spending increases. Many of the president's proposals [may be] unlikely to pass Congress, but the most important have a chance of winning bipartisan support. They deserve bipartisan support. Again, most of these proposals have been made by Republicans, not just by Democrats. But even if we cannot get the Republicans to support the proposal--because at least on the spending side it is the President's proposal; on the revenue side, it is now a Democratic Senate proposal in terms of the millionaires' surcharge--but if the Republicans will not vote for it, if they will not offer a substitute, an alternative of their own, if they will not seek to amend it to improve it, for heaven's sake, allow us to take up this bill.
On the recordOctober 12, 2011
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from Mike Levin
Jan 18, 2024
As a proud southern Californian, I rise to congratulate my good friend, Representative Kildee from Michigan, on the hard-fought victory last Sunday by his beloved Detroit Lions against the Los Angeles Rams, 24-23. Before the game, I had…
Jan 12, 2022
I thank Chairman Takano for yielding and for his support and partnership on this legislation and all the work that he does leading our committee. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Guard and Reserve GI Bill Parity Act, bipartisan…
Jan 26, 2023
I have an amendment at the desk, No. 18. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 3, line 9, strike the closing quotation mark and the final period. Page 3, after line 9, add…





