When I was Assistant Administrator of AID in the late 1970's, we faced this very issue of fungibility, so we set up methods to make sure that American dollars were insulated from any expenditure for abortion-related activities. We faithfully carried out the Helms amendment. It mostly related to IPPF. It does not spend any substantial amount of its own funds, its central funds, on abortion-related activities. It has affiliates that spend its funds. These are essentially semiautonomous or autonomous affiliates who raise their moneys in countries where abortion is legal. The result of the Mexico City policy is, we could not give any funds to any organization that had any affiliate that spent the funds it raised for anything relating to abortion. That meant we would prevent an organization from being in family planning because, in a third degree, some affiliate spent some money it raised in its local country for something that was legal in this country. That is why this effort really strikes at family planning throughout the world, and why we should turn it down.
Mike Levin: “When I was Assistant Administrator of AID in the late 1970's, we faced this very issue of fungibility, so we set up…”
On the recordSeptember 4, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of the Mexico City policy on family planning funding.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 28, 2026
“Mr. Speaker, it is my honor to recognize Esmeralda Gonzalez and David Ontiveros, residents of Oceanside, as my Co-Constituents of the Month for June 2026.
Jul 1, 2026
Which is why I am so concerned that the first proposal on the 11th National Outer Continental Shelf Program would open waters off the coast of California and in the Gulf off of Florida to offshore drilling.
Jul 24, 2026
These new tariffs are more of the same: a nationwide sales tax that will make life even harder for families already struggling under the costs of Trump’s reckless war in Iran.





