I agree with that. We can interpret history, but we cannot change it. Part of the history of this body is that if we put the onus on future Congresses to do something instead of doing it ourselves, it is unlikely to get done. We pass legislation here--see, I remember in 1980--that says, 'Congress will balance the budget.' I think it became law. We did not. It was in the law, the law that we obligated ourselves to comply with. We took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the laws created pursuant thereto. I asked the Senator from Illinois these questions. How would the monitoring of the flow of receipts and outlays be done to determine whether the budget for any fiscal year is on the track of being balanced? Would this require implementing legislation? There would have to be monitoring, and future legislation would have to take care of the implementation of that monitoring.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of Congress taking responsibility for budget legislation and monitoring.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Our bipartisan Fertility Cost Relief Act would allow individuals to take money from their retirement accounts to build a family without a financial penalty.
“Esmeralda and David represent the very best of what community means. They do not wait to be asked; they simply show up, roll up their sleeves, and give everything they have to the people around them.
For hundreds of thousands of children from low-income families, it is where they learn to read, receive basic health screenings, get support for disabilities, and begin kindergarten with a real chance to succeed.
A government should work for the people, not for whoever writes the biggest cheque. Open the bridge.





