I say, if the Senator will yield, there has never been a point of order based on this kind of an estimate, costs on 87,000 jurisdictions, local governments. There is nothing like this in existence. That is why I phrased my question the way I did. Somebody could offer a first-degree amendment and have an estimate because he or she knew they were going to offer a first-degree amendment, but nobody else in the body knew, and now with a first-degree amendment with an estimate being offered, somebody may say, ``Well, wait a minute; I want to offer a second-degree amendment, and I better go get an estimate or my second-degree amendment is out of order.'' I am just wondering whether or not, if a point of order is raised with that second-degree amendment, is it the intention of the managers then that the body hold up consideration of that second-degree amendment until an estimate could be obtained from the CBO?
On the recordJanuary 25, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of cost estimates for amendments during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 28, 2026
“Mr. Speaker, it is my honor to recognize Esmeralda Gonzalez and David Ontiveros, residents of Oceanside, as my Co-Constituents of the Month for June 2026.
Jul 21, 2026
Our bipartisan Fertility Cost Relief Act would allow individuals to take money from their retirement accounts to build a family without a financial penalty.
Jul 20, 2026
The uptick in reported TBI cases among veterans underlines the urgency to increase funding for the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program to study servicemembers’ and veterans’ brain injuries.
Aug 7, 2026
She has shown that one parent's love, paired with tireless resolve, can move the frontiers of medicine forward.





