Like the underlying bill, this amendment closes off opportunities for innovation and harming our influence around the world before we have even had a chance to fully study, test, and understand CBDCs. This bill and amendment represent the wing of the Republican Party that is anti-science and, ironically, scared of the innovation they claim to like. Again, this amendment does not prohibit the issuance of a CBDC; it is prohibiting the research on how CBDCs work. I can't stress how irresponsible it is for Congress to be passing blanket prohibitions on research based on unwarranted views. I can understand fears about potential outcomes, but I cannot understand fear of research. Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment and H.R. 5403, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Mooney). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes appeared to have it.
Share & report
More from Maxine Waters
While I do not oppose this amendment, I will emphasize that the broad deregulatory nature of the not fit for purpose act is such that it would severely weaken our capital markets and make us more vulnerable to bad actors, both domestic and…
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McHENRY. Mr. Chair, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil), the chair of the House Administration Committee and a great member of the Financial Services Committee on innovation…
With this amendment, my Republican colleagues are really piling on to ensure the Fed is prohibited from even thinking about CBDCs. Yet again, this amendment is not adding anything substantive that isn't already in the bill. Instead, it is…
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McHENRY. Mr. Chair, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Curtis).





