I had four amendments in the Committee on Rules to H.R. 1701; only one was accepted and, of course, I thank the members for that. However, I think I was thrown a bone, a bone to say, well, we did something; but certainly, this does not cure what is wrong with this bill. Let me tell my colleagues about the other amendments that I proposed that were not accepted. One of the amendments that I had was a very simple amendment. The sponsors of the bill had indicated that they wanted this bill to be a floor rather than a ceiling when it comes to State laws, and my amendment would simply strike a single subsection that would have accomplished that goal. Let me just share with my colleagues that 52 of the State Attorneys General earlier signed on to a letter objecting to this bill and, specifically, the preemption section. The Attorneys General stated: ``Any State law that affords consumers the benefit of disclosures in rent-to-own agreements beyond those required by H.R. 1701 would be invalidated.'' This is simply about State preemption.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments to H.R. 1701 and concerns about state preemption.
Share
More from Maxine Waters
By passing this bill, Congress will be telling the world that Congress is OK with corruption, OK with foreign companies buying influence.
Mr. Speaker, I say to Chairman Hill that in light of changes we agreed to today, I want to take a moment to make clarifications about the authority the Treasury has and should use related to the provisions banning large institutional…
Now, this so-called e-delivery provision makes electronic delivery the default communication method for all investors, whether they like it or not. AARP research indicates that a majority of American investors, 80 percent of which are 55…
Mr. Meeks' bill closes documented gaps around multiclass governance structures. Multiclass governance structures are those where corporate insiders or beneficial owners retain an outsized amount of voting power relative to their shares…





