Today President Bush requested an additional $46 billion war request. This request is on top of an existing $142 billion request pending from earlier this year. The President told reporters that the funding was simply for day-to-day military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. He said that the bill provides for basic needs like bullets and body armor, protection against IEDs, and mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles. The President would lead us to believe that there are only two options in Iraq; Congress must either continue to fund the war indefinitely, or we must choose to pull the rug out from under the troops and strand them in the field without body armor and bullets. This, of course, is a ridiculous characterization of our position. We feel that continuing to referee a civil war in Iraq runs counter to our national security interests. There is no military solution to the war in Iraq no matter how many soldiers, weapons and dollars you dump into the country. Bombs and bullets have not and will not bring us peace in Iraq. I believe there is only one answer to the war in Iraq: a fully funded redeployment of our troops and military contractors. I think a reasonable Member of Congress would welcome a plan from the President on how we're going to safely leave Iraq, and we would be happy to fund it.
Maxine Waters: “Today President Bush requested an additional $46 billion war request. This request is on top of an existing $142 billion…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing President Bush's request for additional funding for the Iraq war.
Share
More from Maxine Waters
Now, this so-called e-delivery provision makes electronic delivery the default communication method for all investors, whether they like it or not. AARP research indicates that a majority of American investors, 80 percent of which are 55…
this bill, H.R. 1450, the OFAC Licensure for Investigators Act from Representative Beatty would develop a program at the Department of the Treasury that would allow financial crime investigators, including those at the Office of Foreign…
Mr. Chair, Republicans claim that section 202 purports to modernize retirement options for nurses, teachers, and nonprofit workers. Let me be clear: It does not. In reality, this provision opens these workers' retirement accounts called…





