What I would like to do is try to explain why this debate will have a negative effect on Social Security. Currently, the Federal government does not have enough money to run its day to day operations. There are many reasons for this, including: a decline in the economy, a reduced tax revenue, the burst of the stock market bubble, and the President's $1.7 trillion tax cut from last year. In order to meet its obligations, the government borrows money. Much of the borrowing comes from the Social Security and Medicare trust funds, since it currently takes in more money than it pays out in benefits. So the government writes an 'IOU' for the trust fund and uses the money to pay for its operations. Currently, this is not a big deal. However, beginning in 2017, Social Security will pay out more than it takes in. In 2041, the trust funds' reserves are exhausted--in other words there is no more money to pay full benefits. The money the Federal government takes in will only pay for 73 percent of benefits.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of raising the debt limit on Social Security during a House debate.
Share
More from Maxine Waters
By passing this bill, Congress will be telling the world that Congress is OK with corruption, OK with foreign companies buying influence.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Ms. Salazar for withdrawing her words, and let's get on with this discussion about socialism. Instead of legislating and doing the work to tackle real problems-- Americans face the skyrocketing cost of groceries…
Mr. Chair, Republicans claim that section 202 purports to modernize retirement options for nurses, teachers, and nonprofit workers. Let me be clear: It does not. In reality, this provision opens these workers' retirement accounts called…
I rise in support of H.R. 4431, the Improving Capital Allocation for Newcomers Act of 2025, or ICAN Act, offered by Mr. Timmons and Ms. Pettersen. Like the DEAL Act, the ICAN Act also amends the definition of ``venture capital fund'' under…





