Elimination of Title II-A would result in thousands of layoffs and inhibit local and state efforts to improve teacher, paraprofessional, and school leader supports - defunding this program most certainly does not align with the bipartisan intent of the authorizing statute.
Mark DeSaulnier: “Elimination of Title II-A would result in thousands of layoffs and inhibit local and state efforts to improve teacher…”
Editor's note · Context
Warns about negative impacts of cutting Title II-A funding on education.
Share
More from Mark DeSaulnier
At a time when public confidence in Congress is at historic lows and the House's ability to self-police member conduct is under intense scrutiny, enforcing lawful congressional process is vital to delivering swift transparency and…
It is unfortunate there are--there is work we can do with ERISA, clearly, but being as partisan as you just introduced this...
This Committee should move forward with House Democrats' legislation to extend drug price negotiations beyond Medicare.
When ERISA was enacted in 1974, Congress made its intent clear. The law's primary purpose is to 'protect the interest of participants in employee benefit plans, and their beneficiaries.'





