But to do it in terms of a constitutional amendment, I believe, is unwise for several reasons; one of them being the reality that starting in the year 2024 Social Security is not running a surplus, but a deficit. That means that anyone 35 years of age or younger right now would, if this amendment were adopted, be in some jeopardy. So I favor statutorily doing that. I do not favor blocking that off in terms of the Constitution because of the long-term implications. And then I would finally say, the need to pass something. When Senator Riegle says it is just a slip of paper that is there, that is what is there for Social Security trust funds right now, called U.S. bonds. And where are we headed? Every other nation, when we go down that road, every other nation has monetized the debt, had hyperinflation. The most recent example is Mexico. In 1988, they had a 12.5-percent deficit relative to GDP. They had 114 percent inflation. That 114 percent inflation means cutting the Social Security trust funds in half, cutting savings in half, and everything else.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of a proposed constitutional amendment regarding Social Security.
Share
More from Lateefah Simon
Every one of those bright young men on that team will not be protected by this Reid amendment, because of the deficit situation. We cannot adopt a constitutional amendment that anticipates we are going to have a surplus into the indefinite…
I do not think there is any question that the CIA has to monitor the personal finances of people who work for the CIA. If there is anyone who is working for the CIA and is showing a very lavish lifestyle, serious questions have to be asked.
Will my colleague recall any other time we had an amendment offered where the sponsors of the amendment requested that there had to be a 67-vote approval for the acceptance of the amendment?
You are in the same category. This was put together by OMB to show what a great thing they have done. Down here it says ``future generations.'' Before we passed reconciliation last year, column 1 says that 93 percent of lifetime earnings…





