Political Quotes

On the recordNovember 18, 2010
Well, this is another issue that's going to be before the Congress in the next couple of weeks, and that is, what are we going to do about the 2001, 2003 tax reductions that expire on December 31? Those tax reductions were pushed forward by George W. Bush and the Republicans, who then controlled both this House and the Senate. And they wrote the tax law so that the middle-income got a little bit. It was worthwhile. It was a good reduction. But the real reduction went to those with the big bucks, those who had more than $250,000, $500,000, $1 million, $1 billion annual incomes. They got the big bucks. And what happened was, we saw, once again, the widening of the gap between the working men and women of the middle class and the high and the mighty, the top 1 percent of this Nation who now control 70, 80 percent of all the wealth of the Nation. They certainly have the big salaries. And do they need a tax break at the expense of an unemployed worker from a factory in your district, an unemployed worker from a factory or from a school in my district? I don't think so. Let's talk about what it is. For those making $1 million a year, the tax cut is worth $83,000 a year. Now, you tell me how many out there in middle America are making $83,000 a year. Well, we know that there are 2 million that are unemployed that certainly aren't. But if you took that money, that $83,000 for all those millionaires, you could create 3 million jobs that would pay $30,000 a year.
Said by
John Garamendi
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Garamendi discusses the impact of expiring tax reductions and income inequality.

Share

More from John Garamendi

Jun 15, 2026

I cannot, in good faith, approve a budget that rewards this behavior and fails to rein in an out-of-control President."

garamendi.house.gov
Jun 8, 2026

“I had the chance to meet with each of these students, and I’m pleased to announce that our country’s future is in good hands with these bright and capable future service members.”

garamendi.house.gov
Jun 11, 2026

We urge you to pause and consider the long-term legal and financial ramifications of collaborating with the Trump administration to circumvent California law.

garamendi.house.gov
Jun 11, 2026

The administration’s reliance on the Defense Production Act (DPA)—no doubt in consultation and coordination with lawyers representing Sable—is a serious misuse of a federal law meant to be invoked for national security reasons, not to…

garamendi.house.gov

Other voices in this conversation