Let's bring this issue that you just raised right back to this Chamber in the present moment. We have voted here three times, I believe, on what are called programs for energy conservation. One of them was called cash for caulkers. We had the cash for clunkers, which really helped the auto industry. And we decided, well, let's try something, cash for caulkers, which is exactly what you talked about. It's about bringing about energy conservation. And in doing that, two good things happened: we're employing people. Taking our tax dollars. Get this back up here. We don't have conservation on here, but if we were to add conservation, taking our tax dollars instead of giving them to the coal and the oil companies, give it to men and women in the communities that are doing the insulation, doing the window caulking. {time} 2250 As that is done, homeowners and renters see their energy bills drop. What happened on this floor when those bills came up? What is your memory of how the votes turned out?
Share & report
More from John Garamendi
Mr. Speaker, the combination of the late hour together with too much time to talk led to a really foolish discussion from my colleague on the right. This issue is of paramount importance to the military. I am just going to cite three, four…
Madam Speaker, the historic Inflation Reduction Act lowers everyday costs Americans are struggling to afford by cutting the price of prescription drugs, by making the largest-ever investment in climate action, and by reducing…
Mr. Chairman, I have a question. I have a question about fairness in the debate. The chair of the subcommittee has offered two pro forma amendments, giving my side of the debate no opportunity whatsoever to respond to the issues that have…
Mr. Chairman, I think I will take a deep breath. I was a little wound up a few moments ago. If the opposition to this amendment would like to go through that process of an additional 5 minutes, we will play that game, and I would actually…





