You will hear this from the other side as they close, Oh, but you are going to be able to get some $300 million. Yes, that money will flow more quickly into the treasury to be sure because it allows the water districts, as a result of the way in which this bill is written, to achieve an enormous advantage. They will be able to get water into the future without having to pay the full cost of that water. So when you look at it from the total accounting procedures, you wind up with an additional subsidy going to these water districts. It's not right, and it's not fair to the taxpayers. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Chairman, I yield 30 seconds to my good friend from California (Mr. Nunes).
On the recordFebruary 29, 2012
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from John Garamendi
Jul 2, 2026
Bloated defense spending has been a serious problem for far too long. Requiring unfunded priorities only encourages the Pentagon to seek additional funding outside the normal budget process, often at the expense of readiness and sound…
Jun 11, 2026
Last year, I called Republicans’ budget reconciliation bill ‘the largest transfer of wealth from working Americans in U.S. history.’
Jun 11, 2026
The environmental impacts, along with the economic fallout from those impacts, are simply too great, especially when there is little to no benefit for California consumers.
Jun 7, 2026
The bill that passed is a loss for the country, and one whose consequences our children will feel for years to come unless Democrats regain control of Congress.





