You are a brilliant legislator and a fine arbiter of the question. It turns out you're right. It is the oil industry. And let's take a look at this. Our tax dollars: Where do they go? Let's see here. This side is the oil industry, and this is from 2002 to 2008. So we got some numbers up here for fossil fuels between 2002 and 2008. This is the oil and a little bit of the coal: $72.5 billion of direct subsidies, our tax money, being taken out of our pocket and given to the oil industry-- $72.5 billion in just 6 years. So where does it go? Let's see here. Traditional fossil fuels. Oil and coal. There you have it. Now, on the other side, renewable energy. Well, we have the corn ethanol industry, and they have received about $16.8 billion. And then the traditional renewables, these would be solar and wind and the like, about $12.2 billion. So taken together $29 billion for renewables in the same 6-year period that the oil industry received $72.5 billion. Now the question of public policy is this: What if we flipped this over? What if we flipped this around and we took the $72.5 billion and spent it on renewables and we can continue a little bit of the subsidy if they really need it, which they really don't--not if you have $58 billion of profits. Doesn't seem to me they need much help. But, okay. We'll just flip it over, and they'll take $29 billion, and we give the renewable industry the $72 billion. What would happen?
Editor's note · Context
Garamendi discusses the disparity in subsidies between the oil industry and renewable energy sources.
Share
More from John Garamendi
Californians do not want oil production restarting along their coasts and have voted repeatedly for California laws that block coastal oil production.
$1.5 trillion, or $1,500,000,000,000. That is the egregious and dangerously irresponsible amount of money the Trump Administration has requested for military spending.
If Democrats controlled Congress, I am confident we would put an end to this dangerous level of spending while continuing to provide for the American people.
We write in opposition to the Office of Management and Budget’s disastrous and likely unlawful proposed rule that would devastate American health care innovation for generations.





