Obviously, that would not be achievable for any length of time, and that means that American families, kids, seniors would go hungry.
Jimmy Panetta: “Obviously, that would not be achievable for any length of time, and that means that American families, kids, seniors…”
Editor's note · Context
Discusses the consequences of reducing SNAP benefits on vulnerable populations.
Share
More from Jimmy Panetta
In closing, as you have heard, this legislation has full bipartisan support of the Ways and Means Committee and beyond, and support from CBP's Air and Marine Operations. It is critical that we give AMO the authorities it needs to…
Obviously, I thank Representative Foster for yielding me this time. I also thank Chairman McHenry for that very comprehensive and exact description of this piece of legislation and his kind words. Mr. Speaker, I do rise today, as well, to…
I rise as a co-lead of the Studying NEPA's Impact on Projects Act. As we have heard, this is a bill that would require the Council on Environmental Quality to provide annual reports that evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the…
Now, I was proud to work across the aisle this last December with Congressman Greg Murphy on the Preserving Seniors' Access to Physicians Act, H.R. 6683.





