Political Quotes

Jared Huffman: Mr. Speaker, again, the plan that this resolution targets for disapproval is not in place. It has been rescinded by the…

On the recordNovember 18, 2025
Mr. Speaker, again, the plan that this resolution targets for disapproval is not in place. It has been rescinded by the Trump administration. If ever there is a case for a misapplication of the CRA, it would be this right here. I think, Mr. Speaker, it is an important time for us to step back and consider why using a CRA for any, frankly, public land management plan, but certainly for one that has already been rescinded, is just a recipe for uncertainty and conflict and litigation. Nearly a third of our Nation's land mass, 640 million acres, is managed by the Federal Government. The Forest Service manages 193 million acres. BLM manages 244 million in addition to 713 million acres of Federal minerals. For nearly 50 years, BLM and the Forest Service have managed these lands under management plans required by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the National Forest Management Act. These plans, known as resource management plans, or RMPs, establish safeguards for watersheds and recreation areas. They facilitate energy development and grazing and logging and other commercial activities and provide a mechanism for harmonizing the needs of local communities with our national goals and perspectives.
Said by
Jared Huffman
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of a resolution targeting a rescinded public land management plan.

Share

More from Jared Huffman

Aug 13, 2026

He's turning a place that belongs to the American people into his very own DC Mar-a-Lago on the taxpayers' dime.

commondreams.org
Feb 4, 2026

I oppose H.R. 4090 for all the reasons that have been discussed. This is a bill that directs the administration to prioritize and approve mines, any mines that it wants, even ones owned by foreign adversaries, giving them an expedited path…

govinfo.gov
Aug 29, 2026

I will fight this, both for Yosemite and for every treasured park that would be up for grabs if this domino falls.

theguardian.com
Feb 4, 2026

Mr. Speaker, there we have it, and I am sure not for the last time in this conversation. The risk of terrible environmental harm by this huge corporate giveaway is nothing to worry about because we have NEPA. We have the Clean Water Act…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation