What about H.J. Res. 46, which reimposes the very narrow definition of 'habitat' from the Trump administration? Why would locking that definition of 'habitat' into ESA practice be so problematic?
Jared Huffman: “What about H.J. Res. 46, which reimposes the very narrow definition of 'habitat' from the Trump administration? Why…”
Editor's note · Context
Huffman questions the impact of H.J. Res. 46 on habitat definitions under the ESA.
Share
More from Jared Huffman
Trump is running the most corrupt presidency in American history, and he's working overtime to make sure no one is left to hold him accountable," said Huffman. "He fired the real watchdogs, tried to gut their budgets, and now he's stuffing…
now we hear about a gold mine on the Canadian side of the Boundary Waters watershed that has been producing minerals without incident. I am beginning to worry that my colleagues don't understand basic hydrology and how water flows and…
Mr. Speaker, I have a couple of points. First of all, Federal wildlife managers under current law already have to follow the best available science. If they were to issue lead ammunition regulations randomly, arbitrarily, in a way that…
Our parks belong to all of us. These places should be protected for every generation, not sold off to Trump’s ultra-wealthy friends to profit off of.





