Jared Huffman: “This amendment simply aligns the bill with the recently signed MOU with the Bureau of Reclamation regarding these…”

“This amendment simply aligns the bill with the recently signed MOU with the Bureau of Reclamation regarding these studies. We do not oppose it. It is consistent with an earlier policy rider added to the Energy and Water Appropriations bill. Contrary to some of the things we have heard in this debate, I and other Democrats are not standing in the way of these storage studies. The delta smelt and the environmental laws are not standing in the way of these storage studies. In fact, my own drought bill, H.R. 2983, provides crucial funding and direction to the Bureau of Reclamation to finish CALFED feasibility studies that have the financing possible to be completed within the next 10 years. We do support finishing these studies. Now, some of these projects may pencil out, but I think it has become clear over the many, many years these studies have languished that some of these projects have turned into zombie reservoirs which won't go away because project proponents have never been forced to fully account for how their financing will actually work. Many of these projects will not pencil out, but it is high time that we complete the studies, face the reality, and get the information so that we can move on with real water solutions. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. LaMalfa). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Calvert The Acting CHAIR.…”