your testimony that we should continue the 120-year policy of beneficiary pays and look at things like cost effectiveness when we consider Federal investments in water infrastructure has touched a nerve.
Huffman responds to Sewell's testimony on federal water investment policies.
Share
More from Jared Huffman
I think common sense is that if an agency is proposing or is considering a project that would be the tipping point for a community that is already overburdened by pollution, and that would dramatically increase a problem like Cancer Alley…
They looked past the religious elements of the insurrection and the country kind of went back to sleep.
Mr. Speaker, there they go again. For the second time, we hear references to NEPA, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, the bedrock environmental laws, that they will protect us from all of these terrible scenarios that they…
I will fight this, both for Yosemite and for every treasured park that would be up for grabs if this domino falls.
Other voices in this conversation
