Given that you apparently are knowingly marketing to young people and you know that these young people, in particular, their weapon of choice is the assault weapon, the AR-15, why do you think companies should be shielded from liability if a weapon marketed to a young person and is used by young person to massacre a community?
Speier questions the liability protections for companies marketing assault weapons to youth.
Share
More from Jackie Speier
I think there is no question that there is a 14th Amendment violation to women serving at these 109 installations where they cannot access the abortion care nearby.
I thank the gentleman for really powerful remarks. This issue doesn't have to be that hard, but because of legislation that has been passed previously, it has made it incredibly difficult. I am going to share with you now the stories of…
DOD must act now to provide the right resources at the right time at the right place so that service members and their families--who have no choice about where they live--continue to have access to the reproductive care they need, want…
Other voices in this conversation
