Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 16, 2011
I plan to vote against this amendment. I want to just make two points: one, the gentleman from New York's argument is very good if, in fact, U.S. Institute of Peace was simply another think tank. If it were, then why shouldn't they compete like other think tanks do for projects and contracts through the discretionary funds of the appropriate agencies and decided on that basis? But the U.S. Institute of Peace is not just the Brookings Institute or the Heritage Foundation. It's really more of a ``do'' tank than a think tank. It engages very specifically in projects, implementing projects that have direct benefits for our forces and for our diplomats based on their charter. Secondly, if we're going to zero out the U.S. Institute of Peace because it's no longer necessary because it isn't worthy of a direct earmark, then repeal the legislation that created it. There wasn't legislation that created Heritage or Brookings or American Enterprise Institute. These were private organizations. The U.S. Institute of Peace was created by legislation, passed by both Houses.
Said by
Howard Berman
California

Editor's note · Context

The speaker is addressing the importance and unique role of the U.S. Institute of Peace in comparison to other think tanks.

Share

More from Howard Berman

Nov 28, 2012

By choosing not to go forward with a ground operation he saved countless Israeli and Palestinian lives.

congress.gov
Nov 27, 2012

Musicians and artists need to get adequately compensated to continue to create and share their art.

congress.gov
Dec 19, 2012

the amount shows in each of the last 3 fiscal years cuts by the Congress from the requested amount, particularly in construction, maintenance, and Embassy security.

congress.gov
Dec 30, 2012

I don't see the one individual who asked to join me in speaking on this, so I yield back the balance of my time.

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation