I thank you for yielding to me. I want to join you in urging support for this amendment. Whatever the motivation is of your legislation--and I can understand your reason for being very skeptical. I share it. But what the industry should want is regulatory certainty. And this bill adds more confusion to what is already a long overdue effort to reduce toxic air pollution from boilers and incinerators. With no timeline for implementation of new emissions standards, the bill creates significant questions about how EPA would set limits for toxic air pollution. If they think it's regulatory certainty that they don't have to do anything for years, they'd better not count on it. And if they want regulatory certainty, they'd better come forward and work something out. In the meantime, your clarification provides the certainty, and I urge Members to support it.
Share & report
More from Henry Waxman
May I inquire how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Womack). The gentleman from California has 47\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from Washington has 44 minutes remaining.
I yield myself an additional 1 minute. This bill creates a new process to rubberstamp every other pending and future tar sands pipeline. It even exempts these massive projects from the National Environmental Policy Act by limiting the NEPA…
I won't take 25 minutes to rebut the statement that was just made. I yield myself 3 minutes. I am impressed by the statement we had from a man who is trying to educate, as he says, the American people in that Republicans worry about 11…
I appreciate all of the nice words, but let's recognize this amendment. We just heard the statement that this doesn't apply to the Keystone XL pipeline because that is pending, and the bill says it doesn't apply to any project with permit…





