Political Quotes

Henry Waxman: I am releasing today an important report. It is titled Hitting the Jackpot: How the House Energy Bill (H.R. 4) Rewards…

On the recordAugust 1, 2001
I am releasing today an important report. It is titled Hitting the Jackpot: How the House Energy Bill (H.R. 4) Rewards Millions in Contributions with Billions in Returns. Mr. Speaker, what this report indicates is that the cumulative value of campaign contributions from coal, oil, gas, nuclear and electric utility industries in the 2000 election cycle was $69.5 million. The cumulative value of the tax breaks and subsidies for these industries in this energy bill comes to $36.4 billion. If campaign contributions are viewed as a form of investment in the legislative process, the rate of return on this investment is an astounding 52,200 percent. Mr. Speaker, I want to point out that the majority sets the agenda, and they set an agenda that gave away $2 trillion in tax cuts earlier this year. They are now going to give away $36 billion in tax breaks and subsidies to the energy special interests. We have a rule before us that will not provide for an opportunity to move to strike these provisions. The American people ought to understand that this is not a balanced bill. This is a special interest bill. It appears to include rewards for the campaign contributions from the energy industry. Boy, are they getting a good return on their money.
Said by
Henry Waxman
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing a report on campaign contributions and tax breaks in the House Energy Bill.

Share

More from Henry Waxman

Nov 20, 2014

I thank my colleague for those generous comments, and I am pleased to be here today to express why this bill should not pass. Mr. Chairman, the bill is called the Promoting New Manufacturing Act. We would all want to do that--what a nice…

govinfo.gov
Nov 20, 2014

Subsection 3(b) creates a loophole in the Clean Air Act that allows new facilities to meet old air quality standards. This means more pollution will enter the air, and it will be harder to clean up. When one facility is allowed to pollute…

govinfo.gov
Nov 19, 2014

So what we are seeing is something that sounds good from a party that has no credibility to say that they are for more science information. What they would do is limit what EPA would be able to use to determine, based on the science, what…

govinfo.gov
Jul 11, 2019

No Nation ever yet found any inconvenience from too close an inspection into the conduct of its officers.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation