I rise in strong support of H.R. 3759, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Assistance, which include $7.77 billion for disaster relief and $1.1 billion in additional Small Business Administration [SBA] disaster loans for the victims of the Los Angeles/Northridge earthquake. The Los Angeles/Northridge earthquake is the costliest natural disaster in our Nation's history. As we consider this important legislation, we still do not know what the full extent of the damage and cost of the disaster will be. The ongoing aftershocks, some of them significant earthquakes in their own right, are continuing to add to the list of injuries and property damage. We have an obligation to help the victims of this earthquake without delay; 57 people have been killed and more than 6,500 people have been injured, 55,000 homes have been damaged or destroyed, and 21,000 structures have been declared uninhabitable, 230,000 people have applied for disaster assistance. Jobs have been lost; hospitals, schools, and businesses have been closed; major thoroughfares have collapsed; and any regained sense of personal security is under attack with each new aftershock. In my own district, residential and commercial areas have been devastated. Many owners and tenants have no insurance to cover their losses. St. John's Hospital, which is an important health facility worth approximately $25 million, has been condemned and closed.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the need for disaster relief funding following the Los Angeles/Northridge earthquake.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
Although he made a number of very sensible recommendations, we heard at our hearing last September that the CSB chairman failed to adequately address these problems, and in fact, had created a dysfunctional work environment.
But yesterday Takata responded that, quote, 'the currently available reliable information does not support a nationwide determination of a safety defect,' end quote.
Subsection 3(b) creates a loophole in the Clean Air Act that allows new facilities to meet old air quality standards. This means more pollution will enter the air, and it will be harder to clean up. When one facility is allowed to pollute…





