It without this legislation becoming law does not make a distinction between privately and publicly owned. If there is a regulation to protect the consumers or environment or to protect public health, it would apply equally. There is no reason why we ought to even put them in a position where one ought to be regulated and the other not, if the reasoning for the regulation is sound.
Discussing the implications of legislation on regulation of privately and publicly owned entities.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
It is not for the President to say or to obstruct congressional deliberations and investigations or other legitimate functions.
The House's need for all the facts surrounding suspected Presidential offences cannot of course be circumscribed by an executive determination of what is relevant.
What the Constitution does not allow is our leaders breaking the Constitution, or the law, to serve their political needs.
I think of how Henry Waxman showed America the true face of the tobacco industry, exposing decades of deceit.
Other voices in this conversation
