I just am astounded by some of the things that are said in the House, that there has not been a careful analysis of this proposal and the harm that comes with these mercury pollutants, because the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, the people in your State that enforce the clean air laws, talked about regulation yielding $7 billion to $18 billion annually in benefits, which is enormous when compared to the estimated $350 million and $950 million in annual costs. Cement plants employ workers who also can get sick from all of this, but the American cement industry did us a report of their own on this; and in November of last year, analysis by the Portland Cement Association predicts that domestic cement production will increase more than 25 percent from today's levels by 2013 when these rules go into effect and more than 50 percent by 2015. So they don't think they're going to be losing jobs under this proposal.
On the recordFebruary 17, 2011
Editor's note · Context
Waxman addresses the economic and health impacts of mercury pollution regulations on the cement industry.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
Nov 20, 2014
I thank my colleague for those generous comments, and I am pleased to be here today to express why this bill should not pass. Mr. Chairman, the bill is called the Promoting New Manufacturing Act. We would all want to do that--what a nice…
Mar 11, 2019
the Federal Government would maintain its commitment to sharing the costs of providing basic healthcare and long-term coverage to vulnerable Americans.
Dec 2, 2014
We need to make sure that companies and regulators can keep pace with innovation.
Jul 11, 2019
What the Constitution does not allow is our leaders breaking the Constitution, or the law, to serve their political needs.





