Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 9, 2014
I would like to offer my thoughts on H.R. 4701, the Tick-Borne Disease Research Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014. H.R. 4701 would create a new working group to review efforts on Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases within the Department of Health and Human Services. I support efforts to advance research and public input in this area, but I remain concerned that today's legislation is not the best way to advance these goals. Specifically, I have concerns that H.R. 4701 could unnecessarily politicize federal activities on Lyme disease and potentially result in recommendations that are not supported by a strong, scientific evidence base. I hope that my colleagues in the Senate will take a careful look at H.R. 4701 and make changes to address these concerns before considering it further. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Burgess) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 4701, as amended. The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. The title was amended so as to read: ``A bill to provide for research with respect to Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases, and for other purposes.'' A motion to reconsider was laid on the table. ____________________
Said by
Henry Waxman
Democratic · California
Source
govinfo.gov
Sep 9, 2014

Share

More from Henry Waxman

Dec 2, 2014

We need to find answers to these questions, and I hope the committee will continue its investigation even after the time you and I, Mr. Chairman, will be gone.

congress.gov
Feb 3, 2015

The Honorable Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Member

congress.gov
Nov 20, 2014

I claim the time in opposition, although I am not opposed to the amendment. The CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.

govinfo.gov
Nov 20, 2014

Subsection 3(b) creates a loophole in the Clean Air Act that allows new facilities to meet old air quality standards. This means more pollution will enter the air, and it will be harder to clean up. When one facility is allowed to pollute…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation