What the amendment before us would do is, even if we found a needle exchange program could reduce the incidence of AIDS and if, when people came in for needle exchange, they were then encouraged to go into some program to cure their drug addiction, we would not be allowed to use funds for that purpose. That is what troubles me about this amendment.
Henry Waxman: “What the amendment before us would do is, even if we found a needle exchange program could reduce the incidence of AIDS…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to needle exchange programs and funding.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
The $200 billion in the Waxman-Markey bill that passed the House of Representatives was turned down over here in the Senate.
the Federal Government would maintain its commitment to sharing the costs of providing basic healthcare and long-term coverage to vulnerable Americans.
The House's need for all the facts surrounding suspected Presidential offences cannot of course be circumscribed by an executive determination of what is relevant.
I thank my colleague for those generous comments, and I am pleased to be here today to express why this bill should not pass. Mr. Chairman, the bill is called the Promoting New Manufacturing Act. We would all want to do that--what a nice…





