That's your interpretation, but the lawyers said otherwise.
Editor's note · Context
Waxman challenges the chairman's interpretation of the law.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
the Federal Government would maintain its commitment to sharing the costs of providing basic healthcare and long-term coverage to vulnerable Americans.
The reason I qualified it is because I see no reason to oppose the amendment. It is not objectionable. But it doesn't actually fix the bill's four problems. Subsection 3(b) of the bill gives new sources amnesty from compliance with a new…
Thank you very much, Congressman Pallone, for recognizing me and for acknowledging the fact that I am the ranking member at the present time, but, of course, you will now take on that job very ably, I am sure, and both of us will follow in…
We do not know exactly what Takata and auto manufacturers knew about these defective airbags and when they knew it.





