I support the creation of this Select Committee. I think we should have a thorough investigation of the issues surrounding the possible transfer of sensitive technology to China. What I am opposed to is the use of Congressional investigations for partisan political purposes and the waste of taxpayer dollars. It does not serve the American people to have multiple Congressional committees spending millions of dollars investigating the very same issue over and over and over again. Unless we reject this rule and adopt the Condit amendment, we will have redundant investigations that are wasting millions of dollars investigating the very same issue. In March of this year, the Burton committee was given $1.8 million to continue its investigation of the influence of foreign contributions on U.S. policies. A major focus of it was to have been whether contributions from China influenced U.S. foreign policy and national security.
Henry Waxman: “I support the creation of this Select Committee. I think we should have a thorough investigation of the issues…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a Select Committee to investigate technology transfer to China and concerns over redundant investigations.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
It is not for the President to say or to obstruct congressional deliberations and investigations or other legitimate functions.
So what we are seeing is something that sounds good from a party that has no credibility to say that they are for more science information. What they would do is limit what EPA would be able to use to determine, based on the science, what…
Well, the confusing, contrary, uncertain, and sometimes purely nonsensical information that comes from Takata is confusing to drivers.
What the Constitution does not allow is our leaders breaking the Constitution, or the law, to serve their political needs.





