When coal ash is recycled, it is not a waste; and, therefore, EPA has no jurisdiction. It is not a problem. When coal ash is put into a landfill or disposal site and leaches into the water, then it is a problem. This bill doesn't address that problem. It doesn't adequately ensure protection of the public health; or if they have a law at the State level that seems to talk about public health, there's no clear enforcement of it. That is our problem with the legislation. Recycling coal ash for any purpose doesn't make it hazardous, doesn't make it toxic. It can be reused, and we want to encourage that. But we don't want public health threatened. That's what our concern is all about. I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Henry Waxman
There is an old saying, ``you get what you pay for.'' This is true in medicine as in many other fields, and it is why federal healthcare payment policies are so important. The Affordable Care Act made important reforms in this area. We…
I listened carefully to the comments of the gentleman from Kentucky, and I couldn't really follow a lot of it. After all, if the price of natural gas goes up, that would perhaps help the coal industry because the coal industry is not able…
You don't think the bill is needed. Does that mean you are against domestic prosperity and global freedom? Mr. McNERNEY. No, I don't think that is what it means, Mr. Chairman.
I know that the Ambassador from Hungary and other countries that are looking at the possible aggression of the Russians are concerned about not having to rely on Russia alone for their natural gas supplies, and they are desperate. And we…





