Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding to me. Mr. Speaker, I am a strong supporter of science-based policies. Throughout my career, I have always welcomed expert scientific advice and relied upon facts and scientific evidence to legislate. But the bill we are considering today is not a sound science bill; it is actually an anti-science bill. It would take away the ability of decisionmakers to rely on published, peer-reviewed studies to protect our health and our planet. Mr. Speaker, that is why I am opposed to the next bill that we will consider. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman from Texas continue to yield time on this legislation, H.R. 5728?
Share & report
More from Henry Waxman
Mr. Speaker, may I inquire as to how much time we have remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California has 25 minutes remaining. The gentleman from Washington has 22 minutes remaining.
Today's hearing focuses on a growing public health threat, cyanotoxins in drinking water.
Mr. Chairman, I am not a member of the Science Committee, so I wasn't part of the deliberations, but when a bill is presented as being about transparency and openness and relying on science, I ask myself: ``Well, of course, why would there…
Well, it seems to me that it shouldn't be partisan in any way for us to give the grant of money the President has requested to deal with this terrible epidemic in Africa, and to protect Americans as well, and the request is quite balanced…





