Political Quotes

On the recordJune 24, 2011
I believe we do need proper congressional authorization for the military operations we are conducting in Libya, and we need a clear definition of the mission and our objectives. I would very much like to vote for such a measure, but that is not the legislation before us today. Neither bill meets this test. Instead, we have been presented with two unsatisfactory options: an unfortunate choice between a cut-off of all funds for the Libya operation, or support for a broad authorization for the use of force-- except for the deployment of ground forces--that lasts for one year. Moreover, under the rules established by the Republican leadership, no amendments are permitted to either measure. So these are up-and-down votes on a very critical issue involving the ongoing engagement of our military forces against Libya--on a take-it- or-leave-it basis. Neither of these measures has my support today. I have never viewed Libya as being in the vital national security interests of the United States. That in itself is a flashing warning sign and a presumption against military involvement in Libya. This is true notwithstanding the enormous hopes that rose with the democratic uprising that erupted this spring--and the anger and outrage we feel as those expressions for freedom and an end to Qaddafi's tyranny and corruption have been met with the most brutal repression. In March, Qaddafi blatantly threatened to exterminate tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of his people.…
Said by
Henry Waxman
Democratic · California
Source
govinfo.gov
Jun 24, 2011

Share

More from Henry Waxman

Dec 2, 2014

Our legislation improves the early warning reporting system by making more reported information public and ensuring that NHTSA receives significantly more information for manufacturers on any fatal incident involving a safety defect.

congress.gov
Feb 3, 2015

The Honorable Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Member

congress.gov
Nov 20, 2014

The reason I qualified it is because I see no reason to oppose the amendment. It is not objectionable. But it doesn't actually fix the bill's four problems. Subsection 3(b) of the bill gives new sources amnesty from compliance with a new…

govinfo.gov
Nov 19, 2014

So what we are seeing is something that sounds good from a party that has no credibility to say that they are for more science information. What they would do is limit what EPA would be able to use to determine, based on the science, what…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation