Here we are trying to sort through claims that 24 years was not long enough for the power sector to prepare and a potential 5 additional years of compliance time provided by the rule, totaling to a full 29 years since the power sector knew controlling mercury would be required is simply too onerous. The time has come, and the time is now, so let us see what we can do about ensuring the rule that has the least negative impact possible on those who matter most, the American consumer.
Editor's note · Context
Waxman discusses the need for timely compliance with EPA regulations affecting the power sector.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
Because of the time when nothing was being done to address global warming, we are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today.
Mr. Whitfield mentioned that the National Association of Clean Air Agencies would like timely implementation guidance. That is true. But just yesterday, they wrote a letter making clear they oppose this bill. I insert in the Record the…
I want to take this opportunity to pay tribute to Ralph Hall, particularly for his earlier years in the House of Representatives when he was a Democrat. He came on the Energy and Commerce Committee early. We sometimes think about Democrats…
I demand a recorded vote. The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Whitfield The CHAIR. It is now in…





