Faced with these facts, opponents of EPA rules now argue that we should simply ignore the benefits and consider only the costs.
Editor's note · Context
Waxman points out the flawed logic of ignoring benefits in cost analyses of EPA rules.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
This is the trick. On the one hand, you want people to do something, when in fact a lot of folks may not realistically be able to find a job.
Families all across the country expect the safety devices in their vehicles to work.
The reason I qualified it is because I see no reason to oppose the amendment. It is not objectionable. But it doesn't actually fix the bill's four problems. Subsection 3(b) of the bill gives new sources amnesty from compliance with a new…
The use of performance enhancing substance was pervasive for more than a decade, and that everyone in baseball -- the players, the union, the owners and the commissioner -- were responsible.





