If we are going to pay in a straightforward way, let's provide parental leave and not require people to take it out of their sick leave which they cannot do now, and have that leave paid for. This ought to be for newborn and adopted children and their parents, and we ought to provide this. I can imagine there might have been a time when people would have said, ``Why should we allow people to be able to take off 2 weeks of vacation a year? Some employers do it, others don't. This is just too radical.'' Well, now no one thinks it is radical to have 2 weeks of vacation a year at least, and I don't think it is radical, I think it is pro-family, in fact, to allow parents to bond with their children and be able to have 4 weeks paid. That is straightforward; 4 weeks paid leave for maternity or paternity and not to hide it in the sick leave, which they may need at some future time if they have an illness. Having a baby is not an illness.
Editor's note · Context
Advocating for paid parental leave during a discussion on family support policies.
Share
More from Henry Waxman
But yesterday Takata responded that, quote, 'the currently available reliable information does not support a nationwide determination of a safety defect,' end quote.
Although he made a number of very sensible recommendations, we heard at our hearing last September that the CSB chairman failed to adequately address these problems, and in fact, had created a dysfunctional work environment.
What the Constitution does not allow is our leaders breaking the Constitution, or the law, to serve their political needs.
Mr. Chairman, too much dirty politics is waged with dark money, the secrecy is protected by no privilege, and a little sunlight would be very healthy for American democracy.





