I rise to commend Congressmen Conyers and Nadler on crafting a true antiterrorism substitute which balances the fundamental rights of the American people with a firm stance against domestic and international terrorism. Unfortunately, the Hyde legislation before us today threatens personal liberties and constitutional rights. Once again, the Republicans have taken a great idea--combating terrorism--and turned it into a avalanche of extreme ideas. Why has this bill become bloated with controversial provisions? The answer is simple--leverage. It's time for this body to say enough is enough. The Republican leadership should have learned by now that the American people will not be blackmailed into accepting radical new laws from this Congress. The Hyde bill dramatically weakens the fourth amendment by allowing illegal search and seizures if they are conducted in so-called good faith. It also allows for a sweeping definition of terrorism by politically appointed officials without judicial review. Lastly, the bill places too many limits on the right to appeal a conviction under habeas corpus. I urge Members to vote for the Conyers/Nadler substitute which corrects some of these problems, while retaining the good sections of the underlying bill.
George Miller: “I rise to commend Congressmen Conyers and Nadler on crafting a true antiterrorism substitute which balances the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Hyde legislation and advocating for the Conyers/Nadler antiterrorism substitute.
Share
More from George Miller
It is ironic to me that I hear people talk about you cannot pass legislation because we need to respect state water rights.
I would like to commend you for your vigilance on ensuring the districts allocate resources more fairly and improve student access to effective teachers.
the minimum wage appears to not only have employees retain their jobs longer, but employers saying that they are getting the better quality of applicant for that job and they are staying longer at the higher wage.
I do not believe that H.R. 1927 is the appropriate solution to the drought crisis that has imperiled the communities and livelihoods of my great state.





