Mr. Chairman, I also rise respectfully in opposition to the gentlelady's amendment. My district located in the Mississippi Delta region grows nearly half all rice produced in the United States. This amendment jeopardizes the safety net row crop producers in my district depend on to manage risk and stay in business. Given the fact that price volatility is the primary risk mid-South farmers face, and the cost of production is extremely high, the Price Loss Coverage program is the only viable option to provide producers adequate protection. Leading experts and ag economists at Texas A&M University show the average cost of production for rice is $14.92 per hundredweight. The $14 per hundredweight reference price established in the FARRM Bill is realistic and will not kick in unless the producer experiences a loss. What is more, CBO projections already take into account the probability of price movements that can impact the overall cost productions of the PLC policy, and U.S. farm policy has come in well under budget projections for at least the last 7 years. This amendment is unnecessary and will do nothing but create more uncertainty for agriculture producers. The House Agriculture Committee has made a good-faith bipartisan effort to craft a farm bill that reflects a farmer's risk across all regions of the country. This amendment is a step backwards. With all due respect, I urge my colleagues to oppose the gentlelady's amendment.
Share & report
More from Eric Crawford
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, there is a lot to unpack in that statement right there. Let me start with section 1201 of H.R. 3684, which basically requires States to prioritize the state of good…
Madam Speaker, today, I am here to talk about reopening the very building in which we stand, the United States Capitol. It has been 2\1/2\ years since Speaker Pelosi closed the people's House and told Americans it was part of our united…
Mr. Speaker, I think the American people need to understand two things. One, if you eat, you are involved in agriculture. And, two, food security is national security. So, we keep those things in mind as we have this conversation today…
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. DeFAZIO. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone).





