Political Quotes

Doris Matsui: This is not a theoretical debate. The whole issue of Social Security privatization is a real discussion, something that…

On the recordOctober 8, 2002
This is not a theoretical debate. The whole issue of Social Security privatization is a real discussion, something that really will, in fact, occur in 2003. The gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Tom Davis), the Chair of the Republican Campaign Committee, said in the month of August that privatization will be a 2003 issue, they intend to bring it up. Paul O'Neill, the Secretary of the Treasury, has said that he intends to have the President bring up privatization of Social Security in 2003 after the November 5 election. The reason this is a theoretical debate is because this is hard to believe, but my Republican colleagues have five real plans to privatize Social Security. We have President Bush who convened a 14-member commission of experts that essentially came up with three plans to privatize Social Security. The gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw), the chairman of the Subcommittee on Social Security of the Committee on Ways and Means, has drafted a privatization of Social Security plan; and the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Armey), the majority leader, has come up with a plan to privatize Social Security as well.
Said by
Doris Matsui
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the impending debate on Social Security privatization in 2003.

Share

More from Doris Matsui

Jun 20, 2023

This bipartisan support reflects ACP's successes.

congress.gov
Sep 17, 2024

I thank the ranking member for yielding me time. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 1513, the FUTURE Networks Act. To maintain U.S. leadership in wireless communication, we need to be proactive in our preparations for the next…

govinfo.gov
Apr 18, 2023

These communities want broadband connectivity, and with the funding included in the bipartisan infrastructure bill, we have historic opportunity to provide it.

congress.gov
Apr 18, 2023

Rigid, top-down Federal preemption can never be as successful as meaningful incentives to support local collaboration and engagement.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation