Well, there is no question. I think the gentlewoman from Florida (Mrs. Thurman) is absolutely correct. They are basically taking money so there is immediate gratification but at the expense of folks down the road, 5, 10, 15, 20 years down the road.
Discussing the long-term consequences of financial decisions.
Share
More from Doris Matsui
We mandated the removal of every last piece. We did that because it is a clear and immediate national security threat.
FLPMA directs the BLM to give priority to the designation and protection of ACECs.
Allowing this authority to lapse was a failure. To add insult to injury, it was a completely avoidable failure.
Rigid, top-down Federal preemption can never be as successful as meaningful incentives to support local collaboration and engagement.
Other voices in this conversation
