However, I have to say that there are fundamental flaws in this legislation. First of all, it does make significant changes, although the authors talk about technical changes, in the top-heavy rules and the anti-discrimination rules. But these changes are actually substantive changes and, in fact, what they will do is make it more difficult for lower- and middle-income wage earners, employees, to be able to get pension benefits. In addition, statistically, a number of outside groups, because we do not have a joint tax committee distribution table, but a number of outside groups have said that the top 10 percent of the taxpayers will get 62 percent of the benefits in this legislation, and that is taking into consideration the additional employees that will be covered under the original Portman-Cardin legislation. But this is not unusual, because all of the tax bills that we have seen coming from my Republican colleagues over the last 4 or 5 months have been basically for upper-income folks anyway.
Doris Matsui: “However, I have to say that there are fundamental flaws in this legislation. First of all, it does make significant…”
On the recordJuly 19, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing flaws in pension legislation during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Doris Matsui
Jul 16, 2026
His claim that broadcasters will only be allowed to grow when they serve the ‘public interest’ is especially alarming given his record of using the FCC to pressure media companies and advance Donald Trump’s political interests.
Apr 18, 2023
Last year I wrote a letter to the Biden administration urging the Departments of Transportation and Energy, along with NTIA to coordinate on the deployment of electric vehicle charging and broadband infrastructure.
May 22, 2023
NTIA's statutory role, speaking on behalf of the Federal Government on telecommunications and information issues, has never been more important.





