I view the use of Social Security surplus revenues as a major flaw in the balanced budget amendment, but it is a flaw that can be corrected by this amendment. In 1990, this very body, by a vote of 98-2, voted to take it off budget. They said: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the receipts and disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund shall not be counted as new budget authority, outlays, receipts, or deficit or surplus for purposes of (1) the budget of the United States, (2) the congressional budget, or, (3) the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. This body voted for it 98-2. And in the ensuing days, this body is going to reverse their opinion. One must ask why? Why are we doing this?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the balanced budget amendment and its impact on Social Security.
Share
More from Dianne Feinstein
I rise today to introduce the Fighting Homelessness Through Services and Housing Act, which would establish a new Federal grant program to increase capacity for comprehensive supportive services paired with housing as a way to address our…
I rise today to give a belated and fond farewell to a valued and long-standing member of my staff, Mr. David Grannis. Every Member of this Chamber understands the importance of having wise counsel in their corner. It is not only important…
I recently sent letters to you and Administrator Bose to include three wildlife overpasses as required mitigation in the pending permit.
I rise today to introduce the Clean Drinking Water for Rural Communities Act of 2023 and thank my colleague Senator Padilla for joining me as an original cosponsor. Our bill would change the eligibility limit for the water and wastewater…





